|
|
Post by ITCL Web Page on Jul 24, 2008 20:16:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mathews99 on Jul 29, 2008 19:19:31 GMT -5
Looks neat, would like to see someone give that a shot around here...
|
|
|
|
Post by clipper1970 on Aug 17, 2008 17:15:47 GMT -5
WOW!
If you have a good passer this would be an IDEAL offense!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by raiderqb95 on Aug 18, 2008 3:13:59 GMT -5
I know this looks like fun and I know this would be very exciting to play, but I just don't like it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the formation is illegal in College and the Pros, and is a pretty complex offense to grasp. It allows no progression for lineman and serious ball players. While it can drasticly screw up a defense, I just don't feel that this Offense would be worth practicing. It is more of a backyard, razzledazzle game formation.
|
|
|
|
Post by justafan on Jan 12, 2009 0:47:45 GMT -5
It does say that they only use that offense 60% of the time. It looks pretty different, but I also think it shares some principles with the way Crestview plays. Fast, a lot of misdirection and smoke and mirrors. Both revolve around spreading the defense out and getting athletes the ball in space. The only difference I saw is that this offense slings it around whereas Crestview is very physical and runs the ball as well as anyone in the league. I doubt this offense will catch on big time. As with any scheme though, it really comes down to the players running it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bulldog1974 on Jan 12, 2009 13:24:37 GMT -5
I look for the wildcat formation to be used first..It is an old style formation with interesting results. and correct me if I am wrong, wasn't the A11 tried here in a simular formation by Lisbon vs Ep in '02? They had all but 4 out for a pass in that formation...I research this on the cd I have of that season, as I remembered a formation rivaling it. and it looks simiular to what was tried in CA....If so, hats of to Lisbon for trying it....and it didn't work against Ep.....not by a long shot....
|
|
